Air Gap vs. Direct Mounting: Which Installation Method Works Best for Acoustic Panels?

1. Why Installation Method Matters

When installing PET acoustic panels, the mounting method significantly influences acoustic performance. Even if two panels share the same thickness and material, their sound absorption results can differ depending on how they are mounted.

The two most common methods are direct mounting and air gap mounting—each with unique benefits and best-fit scenarios.

2. What Is Direct Mounting?

Direct mounting means fixing the panel flush against the wall or ceiling surface using adhesive, nails, or screws.

Advantages:

  • Sleek and minimal appearance

  • Space-saving design—ideal for smaller rooms

  • Easier, faster installation process

Limitations:

  • Lower low-frequency absorption (below 500Hz)

  • Slightly reduced overall NRC compared to panels with an air gap

Best for:

Meeting rooms, home offices, or spaces where aesthetics and compactness matter more than heavy-duty sound control.

3. What Is Air Gap Mounting?

Air gap mounting adds a space (typically 20–100mm) between the panel and the wall or ceiling. This air cavity improves sound absorption—especially at lower frequencies.

Advantages:

  • Better low-frequency performance

  • Can achieve up to 0.1–0.2 NRC improvement

  • Effective for large or reverberant spaces

Limitations:

  • Slightly more complex installation

  • Consumes extra wall or ceiling depth

Best for:

Recording studios, open offices, classrooms, and auditoriums—anywhere where echo control and speech clarity are critical.

4. How Does Air Gap Improve Performance?

The air gap acts as a secondary absorber. Sound waves penetrate the panel, then partially reflect off the wall behind it, losing more energy in the process.

In practical terms, a 25mm PET panel with a 50mm air gap can perform similarly to a 50mm thick directly mounted panel, offering greater absorption efficiency without extra material cost.

5. Recommended Configurations

Panel ThicknessAir GapTypical NRC (EN ISO 354)Mounting Type
9mm PET Panel0mm0.45–0.55Direct Mount
9mm PET Panel25mm0.65–0.75Air Gap
12mm PET Panel0mm0.60–0.70Direct Mount
12mm PET Panel50mm0.80–0.90Air Gap

Note: Actual results may vary depending on density, mounting type (Type A or E per EN ISO 354), and installation quality.


6. Which Should You Choose?

  • Choose Direct Mounting if:

    • You need a seamless look and minimal wall projection.

    • The room mainly suffers from mid-to-high frequency reflections.

  • Choose Air Gap Mounting if:

    • You want maximum acoustic performance.

    • You’re treating large rooms or high-reverberation spaces.

7. Pro Tip for Installers

If you prefer a hybrid solution, try mounting furring strips behind your PET panels to create a small air gap (20–25mm).

This simple modification can noticeably boost acoustic performance without sacrificing aesthetics.

8. Conclusion

Both air gap and direct mounting methods are effective—your choice depends on your space, performance goals, and visual preferences.

For most general applications, an air gap of 25–50mm provides the best balance between acoustic efficiency and installation practicality.

QUOTE NOW